What is one problem with reliance on casuistry as a system of moral judgment, according to Beauchamp and Childress?
A) Paradigm cases can evolve in the wrong moral direction if they are initially improperly handled, leading to wrong moral judgments about analogous cases in the future.
B) Casuistic thinkers do not consider any general rules, principles, or maxims when discussing cases that require ethical judgment.
C) Reasoning by analogy is not an ethically appropriate way of thinking about cases.
D) Casuistic thinkers do not describe ethical cases properly.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Which of the following do Beauchamp and
Q2: A top-down model of ethical reasoning:
A) Holds
Q3: Which of the following is NOT stated
Q4: What is the form of reasoning used
Q5: What is one way Beauchamp and Childress
Q7: Beauchamp and Childress call their own model
Q8: What is the main thesis of thinkers
Q9: Why do Beauchamp and Childress consider the
Q10: Which of the following is NOT a
Q11: What is a reason given by Beauchamp
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents