Which of the following best captures Rachels's main argument for the main conclusion in "Active and Passive Euthanasia"?
A) There is no inherent moral distinction between active and passive euthanasia because the morality of either action must be assessed in large part by the agent's motives for killing or allowing one to die.
B) There is an important moral distinction between active and passive euthanasia because a person who lets one die technically does nothing to cause another's death, whereas a person who kills directly causes another's death.
C) There is no inherent moral distinction between active and passive euthanasia because all doctors have taken an oath to do no harm and any act of killing or letting die is a violation of this oath.
D) There is an important moral distinction between active and passive euthanasia because active killing measures such as lethal injection will generally be more painless than the mere cessation of treatment.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q880: Why, according to McMahan, shouldn't soldiers be
Q881: Per the traditional distinction that Rachels identifies,
Q882: Removing an artificial nutrition tube from a
Q883: Which of the following best captures the
Q884: Which of the following best captures Rachels's
Q886: What, according to Rachels, is most responsible
Q887: What, according to Rachels, is the principal
Q888: Which of the following does Rachels believe
Q889: According to Rachels, which of the following
Q890: Which of the following claims does Rachels
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents