While thinking about the principle that it is always wrong to torture people, the philosopher Henry Shue imagines a scenario in which torturing a suspect is the only way to save Paris from being destroyed by a nuclear bomb. Based on the discussion in Chapter 6, which of the following would NOT be a plausible way for Shue to respond to that alleged counterexample?
A) Insist that, although it would lead to disaster, the police are still morally obligated to refrain from torturing the suspect.
B) Revise the principle to say that it is always wrong to torture people unless the would-be torturer is extremely confident that it is the only way to prevent a great catastrophe.
C) Argue that although torturing the suspect would violate the would-be torturer's obligation not to torture, the obligation to save Paris is more important in this particular case.
D) Add some detail to the scenario so that torturing the suspect would no longer guarantee that Paris would be saved.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q30: Which of the following is NOT one
Q31: Which of the following is NOT discussed
Q32: How does Mencius respond to the supposed
Q33: How does Robert Nozick respond to the
Q34: According to Chapter 6, how can the
Q36: Intermediate moral principles can help you decide
Q37: Intermediate moral principles can help you resolve
Q38: Intermediate moral principles are needed because general
Q39: Don Marquis uses his intermediate moral principle
Q40: Don Marquis uses his intermediate moral principle
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents