The problem with imagining that contra-causal freedom involves a causal break between the personality and the mental act of choice is that it implies
A) the personality just appears from nowhere and then causes choices.
B) that actions result from a mental event (choice) that is in no way caused by the thoughts, wants, or moral views which we are calling the personality.
C) choices don't result in actions.
D) None of the above

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The issue with imagining contra-causal freedom as a causal break between personality and the act of choice is that it suggests choices are made without being influenced by the individual's thoughts, desires, or moral perspectives, which are integral components of what we define as personality. This undermines the coherence of attributing choices to a person's character or identity.

The Problem with Imagining That Contra-Causal Freedom Involves a Causal