Montero doesn't think defining "physical" by pointing to some clear examples, like rocks and trees, will work because
A) In some ways, quarks are very unlike rocks and trees, but we think quarks are physical.
B) In some ways, beliefs and desires are similar to rocks and trees.
C) Rocks and trees themselves may not be physical if idealism is true.
D) All of the above.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Montero argues that defining "physical" by pointing to clear examples like rocks and trees is problematic because it doesn't account for the full range of what we consider physical, such as quarks, which are very unlike rocks and trees. Additionally, the argument touches on the philosophical perspective of idealism, which suggests that what we perceive as physical might not be truly physical, further complicating the definition.

Montero Doesn't Think Defining "Physical" by Pointing to Some Clear