Fact Pattern 14-2 Charlie and Dill sign a written contract for the sale of Dill's BBQ Food Truck to Charlie. The parties intend their written contract to be a final statement of the terms of their agreement.
Refer to Fact Pattern 14 - 2. Later, Dill disputes some of the provisions in the deal with Charlie. If the dispute results in litigation, a court will most likely exclude evidence that
A) supports the written terms .
B) contradicts the written terms.
C) duplicates the written terms.
D) reinforces the written terms.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A court will most likely exclude evidence that contradicts the written terms due to the parol evidence rule, which prevents parties from presenting extrinsic evidence that contradicts or alters the terms of a written contract intended to be the final agreement.

Fact Pattern 14-2 Charlie and Dill Sign a Written Contract