Fact Pattern 10-2 Brad defends against a breach-of-contract suit by College Credit Corporation by claiming that their deal-a student loan-was unfair because the consideration for the contract was inadequate.
Refer to Fact Pattern 10-2. With respect to Brad's defense, the court will most likely
A) promise to do something that it has no prior legal duty to do.
B) perform an action that it is not otherwise legally obligated to undertake.
C) refrain from allowing the contract to be enforced.
D) permit the contract to be enforced.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Courts generally do not assess the adequacy of consideration in a contract unless there is evidence of fraud, duress, or unconscionability. If the consideration is legally sufficient, the contract is likely to be enforced.

Fact Pattern 10-2 Brad Defends Against a Breach-Of-Contract Suit by College