Which of the following was the result in the "Case Opener" in which Vitol sued Koch Petroleum for delivering oil one day late causing Vitol to sustain a loss based on its sale to another entity?
A) The court ruled that Koch Petroleum had substantially performed and that Vitol could not recover.
B) The court ruled that Koch Petroleum had materially performed and that Vitol could not recover.
C) The court ruled that Koch Petroleum had committed fraud in that the delay was intentional and that Vitol could recover.
D) The court ruled that Koch Petroleum had violated the perfect tender rule and that Vitol could recover.
E) The court ruled that both parties were in the wrong and that damages would be split between the two.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q50: [Business Law Rocks] Business law instructor Courtney
Q51: What did the court rule in the
Q52: If Dominique ordered lobsters from Maine for
Q53: According to the case of Hubbard v.
Q54: [New Furniture] Kristin purchased $2,000 worth of
Q56: [Softball Trophies] To recognize softball players on
Q57: When may a buyer revoke acceptance if
Q58: Under the UCC, which of the following
Q59: [Softball Trophies] To recognize softball players on
Q60: Typically, buyers and lessees ordinarily inspects goods
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents