Determine if the argument is valid or a fallacy. Give a reason to justify answer.
-If you eat well, you will be well.
$\underline { \text {If you are well, you will be happy.} }$
If you eat well, you will be happy.
A) Fallacy by fallacy of the inverse
B) Valid by reasoning by transitivity
C) Valid by modus tollens
D) Fallacy by fallacy of the converse

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The argument is valid by reasoning by transitivity, which states that if A implies B, and B implies C, then A implies C. In this case, eating well implies being well, and being well implies being happy, so eating well implies being happy.

Determine If the Argument Is Valid or a Fallacy If you are well, you will be happy.‾\underline { \text {If you are well, you will be happy.} }If you are well, you will be happy.​

Determine If the Argument Is Valid or a Fallacy $\underline { \text {If you are well, you will be happy.} }$