Some flying horses are dependable steeds. Therefore, some dependable steeds are flying horses.
A) Invalid, existential fallacy.
B) Invalid, illicit conversion.
C) Invalid, illicit contrary.
D) Valid, no fallacy.
E) Invalid, illicit obversion.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The argument correctly infers that if some flying horses are dependable steeds, then some dependable steeds must indeed be flying horses. This is a valid inference with no fallacy involved, as it simply reverses the subject and predicate while maintaining the truth of the original statement.

Some Flying Horses Are Dependable Steeds