The courts can introduce implied terms to contradict written terms if one party is more credible than the other.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The courts generally do not introduce implied terms to contradict written terms, even if one party is more credible than the other. The general approach is to interpret the written terms as they are, unless there are exceptional circumstances such as ambiguity or mistake. In such cases, the courts may imply terms to give effect to the parties' presumed intentions, but not to contradict them.

The Courts Can Introduce Implied Terms to Contradict Written Terms