Contrived observation is considered unethical and unreliable and should not be used in social scientific research.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Contrived observation, when properly conducted and disclosed, can be a useful and ethical method in social scientific research, especially in controlled experiments where natural observation is not feasible. The ethicality and reliability depend on how the observation is designed and implemented, not on the method itself.

Contrived Observation Is Considered Unethical and Unreliable and Should Not