While comparative negligence is generally not a defense in a strict liability case,contributory negligence generally is a successful defense.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

This statement is false. Contributory negligence is generally not a defense in a strict liability case either. Strict liability means that the defendant is liable regardless of any fault on the part of the plaintiff, so the plaintiff's negligence or fault is not relevant. However, some states have modified this rule with doctrines such as comparative fault or comparative negligence, which may reduce the plaintiff's recovery in proportion to their degree of fault.

While Comparative Negligence Is Generally Not a Defense in a Strict