Which of the following need NOT be proved in order to establish the defense of economic duress?
A) That one side involuntarily accepted the terms of another.
B) That circumstances permitted no other alternative.
C) That one party explicitly made an economic threat.
D) That the circumstances leading up to the contract were the result of coercive threats or acts of the opposite party.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

While an explicit economic threat would certainly strengthen a claim of economic duress, it is not an essential element. The key factor is whether the circumstances surrounding the contract left one party with no reasonable alternative but to agree to the terms of another. Factors such as unequal bargaining power, extreme economic hardship or necessity, and a lack of time to consider the terms of the contract may all contribute to a finding of economic duress.

Which of the Following Need NOT Be Proved in Order