Deck 6: Case Law Analysis: Is a Case on Point

ملء الشاشة (f)
exit full mode
سؤال
In order for a case to be on point, the key and background facts of the court opinion must be sufficiently similar to the key and background facts of the client's case.
استخدم زر المسافة أو
up arrow
down arrow
لقلب البطاقة.
سؤال
Even when the key facts of the court opinion and the key facts of the client's case are not similar, the court opinion still may be on point.
سؤال
A case that is on point should be analyzed to help the attorney determine what course of action to take.
سؤال
Persuasive precedent must be followed by the lower courts in the jurisdiction.
سؤال
The determination of whether a case is on point is important because of the doctrines of precedent and stare decisis.
سؤال
A key criterion for a court opinion to be on point is that the key and background facts of the opinion are sufficiently similar to the key and background facts of the client's case.
سؤال
If the law applied in the court opinion is different from that which applies to the client's case, the court opinion cannot be mandatory precedent.
سؤال
If the rule or principle applied in the court opinion is the same rule or principle that applies in the client's case, the opinion is on point.
سؤال
The doctrine of precedent is a basic principle of the common-law system that requires a court to follow a previous decision of that court or a higher court in the jurisdiction when the current decision involves issues and key facts similar to those involved in the previous decision.
سؤال
The determination of whether a case is on point must be made before the case may apply as precedent.
سؤال
In order for a case to be on point, three requirements must be met.
سؤال
Stare decisis is an earlier court decision on an issue that governs or guides a subsequent court in its determination of an identical or similar issue based on identical or similar key facts.
سؤال
A ruling of the highest court in State B may be mandatory precedent for the lower courts in State A.
سؤال
The terms precedent and on point are often used interchangeably.
سؤال
A case is precedent (on point)if there is a sufficient similarity between the key facts and rule of law or legal principle of the court opinion and the matter before the subsequent court.
سؤال
The phrase on all fours is used to describe opinions where the facts of the opinion and those of the client's case and the rule of law that applies are identical or so similar that the court opinion is clearly on point.
سؤال
Case law analysis is the process of determining if a court opinion governs or affects the outcome of a client's case.
سؤال
A court opinion interpreting a common-law rule or principle may apply as precedent for a client's case that requires the application of a different common-law rule or principle.
سؤال
When there is a major difference in the key facts of a court opinion and the key facts of the client's case, the opinion cannot be on point.
سؤال
When the key facts of the court opinion and the key facts of the client's case are not similar, if the substitution of the key facts would not result in changing the outcome of the case, the court opinion can be used as precedent.
سؤال
Precedent is:

A)an earlier court decision on an issue that governs or guides a subsequent court in its determination of an identical or similar issue based on identical or similar key facts.
B)a decision from a higher court in a jurisdiction.
C)a decision that a court may look to for guidance when reaching a decision but is not bound to follow.
D)a basic principle of the common-law system that requires a court to follow a previous decision of that court or a higher court in the jurisdiction when the current decision involves issues and key facts similar to those involved in the previous decision.
E)all of the above
سؤال
A court opinion that a court looks to for guidance when reaching a decision, but is not bound to follow, is referred to as:

A)mandatory precedent.
B)persuasive precedent.
C)stare decisis.
D)on point.
E)all of the above
سؤال
If the law applied in the court opinion is different from the law that applies to the client's case, the opinion can be:

A)persuasive precedent.
B)mandatory precedent.
C)mandatory precedent if the key facts are sufficiently similar.
D)persuasive precedent only if the statutes are part of the same legislative act.
E)all of the above
سؤال
Stare decisis is:

A)an earlier court decision on an issue that governs or guides a subsequent court in its determination of an identical or similar issue based on identical or similar key facts.
B)a decision from a higher court in a jurisdiction.
C)a decision that a court may look to for guidance when reaching a decision, but is not bound to follow.
D)a basic principle of the common-law system that requires a court to follow a previous decision of that court or a higher court in the jurisdiction when the current decision involves issues and key facts similar to those involved in the previous decision.
E)all of the above
فتح الحزمة
قم بالتسجيل لفتح البطاقات في هذه المجموعة!
Unlock Deck
Unlock Deck
1/24
auto play flashcards
العب
simple tutorial
ملء الشاشة (f)
exit full mode
Deck 6: Case Law Analysis: Is a Case on Point
1
In order for a case to be on point, the key and background facts of the court opinion must be sufficiently similar to the key and background facts of the client's case.
False
2
Even when the key facts of the court opinion and the key facts of the client's case are not similar, the court opinion still may be on point.
True
3
A case that is on point should be analyzed to help the attorney determine what course of action to take.
True
4
Persuasive precedent must be followed by the lower courts in the jurisdiction.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 24 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
5
The determination of whether a case is on point is important because of the doctrines of precedent and stare decisis.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 24 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
6
A key criterion for a court opinion to be on point is that the key and background facts of the opinion are sufficiently similar to the key and background facts of the client's case.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 24 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
7
If the law applied in the court opinion is different from that which applies to the client's case, the court opinion cannot be mandatory precedent.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 24 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
8
If the rule or principle applied in the court opinion is the same rule or principle that applies in the client's case, the opinion is on point.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 24 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
9
The doctrine of precedent is a basic principle of the common-law system that requires a court to follow a previous decision of that court or a higher court in the jurisdiction when the current decision involves issues and key facts similar to those involved in the previous decision.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 24 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
10
The determination of whether a case is on point must be made before the case may apply as precedent.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 24 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
11
In order for a case to be on point, three requirements must be met.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 24 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
12
Stare decisis is an earlier court decision on an issue that governs or guides a subsequent court in its determination of an identical or similar issue based on identical or similar key facts.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 24 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
13
A ruling of the highest court in State B may be mandatory precedent for the lower courts in State A.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 24 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
14
The terms precedent and on point are often used interchangeably.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 24 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
15
A case is precedent (on point)if there is a sufficient similarity between the key facts and rule of law or legal principle of the court opinion and the matter before the subsequent court.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 24 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
16
The phrase on all fours is used to describe opinions where the facts of the opinion and those of the client's case and the rule of law that applies are identical or so similar that the court opinion is clearly on point.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 24 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
17
Case law analysis is the process of determining if a court opinion governs or affects the outcome of a client's case.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 24 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
18
A court opinion interpreting a common-law rule or principle may apply as precedent for a client's case that requires the application of a different common-law rule or principle.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 24 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
19
When there is a major difference in the key facts of a court opinion and the key facts of the client's case, the opinion cannot be on point.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 24 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
20
When the key facts of the court opinion and the key facts of the client's case are not similar, if the substitution of the key facts would not result in changing the outcome of the case, the court opinion can be used as precedent.
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 24 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
21
Precedent is:

A)an earlier court decision on an issue that governs or guides a subsequent court in its determination of an identical or similar issue based on identical or similar key facts.
B)a decision from a higher court in a jurisdiction.
C)a decision that a court may look to for guidance when reaching a decision but is not bound to follow.
D)a basic principle of the common-law system that requires a court to follow a previous decision of that court or a higher court in the jurisdiction when the current decision involves issues and key facts similar to those involved in the previous decision.
E)all of the above
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 24 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
22
A court opinion that a court looks to for guidance when reaching a decision, but is not bound to follow, is referred to as:

A)mandatory precedent.
B)persuasive precedent.
C)stare decisis.
D)on point.
E)all of the above
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 24 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
23
If the law applied in the court opinion is different from the law that applies to the client's case, the opinion can be:

A)persuasive precedent.
B)mandatory precedent.
C)mandatory precedent if the key facts are sufficiently similar.
D)persuasive precedent only if the statutes are part of the same legislative act.
E)all of the above
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 24 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
24
Stare decisis is:

A)an earlier court decision on an issue that governs or guides a subsequent court in its determination of an identical or similar issue based on identical or similar key facts.
B)a decision from a higher court in a jurisdiction.
C)a decision that a court may look to for guidance when reaching a decision, but is not bound to follow.
D)a basic principle of the common-law system that requires a court to follow a previous decision of that court or a higher court in the jurisdiction when the current decision involves issues and key facts similar to those involved in the previous decision.
E)all of the above
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 24 في هذه المجموعة.
فتح الحزمة
k this deck
locked card icon
فتح الحزمة
افتح القفل للوصول البطاقات البالغ عددها 24 في هذه المجموعة.